![]() “I think we could make quite a good case for Miss Marple in the books being in her 60s, rather than her 70s or 80s.” “This is almost heresy, but even the Joan Hickson portrayal, which the family considers to be the gold standard… Joan was very old when she started playing her and got older as she played more. I think she’s far more lively and physically able,” he said. “It’s quite an interesting concept of age. While the character is described in the first Marple story, Murder at the Vicarage, as “a white-haired old lady with a gentle, appealing manner”, Mr Prichard suggested that was deceptive. I just don’t think she is as old as we have portrayed her,” Mr Prichard told the Telegraph. ![]() “I think she’s certainly portrayed in the books slightly differently than we have portrayed her on TV before. James Prichard, who is in charge of the Christie estate, said the new Miss Marple will be younger and more sprightly - a mere 60-something. According to the author’s great-grandson, all previous screen incarnations have been too old. The Agatha Christie estate is planning to bring Marple back to television after more than a decade away.īut she will look different. But have we been getting her wrong all this time? All in all, a wonderful adaptation that worked amazingly well even on its own terms.Think of Miss Marple and images of a little old lady spring to mind. The cast is typically strong- Julia McKenzie once again is a splendid Miss Marple and out of the strong supporting cast Sharon Small really stood out in a chilling, fearless yet also touching performance as Mary, and Toby Stephens was brilliant as George. The music is both haunting and beautiful. The production values are superb, with the photography skillful and the scenery and costumes charming. It goes briskly, yet all is explained very well, the script is first-rate, actually the script was quite possibly the best it's been in a while now, and the direction is adept. On its own terms, the adaptation works marvellously. In the adaptation, it does get explained very quickly with each explanation going like bang, bang, bang, but what I liked about the writers doing it that way is that while it was quick there was something quite tense about that scene, and I can't quite put my finger on what made it so tense. The final solution is like the story, very clever. But I liked that, I liked it that this puzzle made you think deep properly without worrying about a changed detail, an odd camera angle or a stilted line from the script. Those who haven't read the story may find the puzzle of the geranium baffling initially. No fear of that really though, because this adaptation not only works as an adaptation but also on its own terms too. Just for the record, I don't rate harshly on an adaptations when they change any details, but when it goes off the boil with the spirit I am not quite so kind. Also, this is faithful to the story, not completely 100% but it actually feels like Agatha Christie. I loved the idea that Miss Marple finds she's wrong, I loved the baffling and clever idea of the pink geranium on the wall turning to blue and while there were some entertaining and touching moments- the scene on the bus is beautifully staged- I loved even better the sinister and heart-racing ones too(something that I feel were missing in some of the previous adaptations) especially the beginning which was very atmospheric. First off, I loved the adaptation's tone. This adaptation was just brilliant, it stuck to the story's tone, the story was still clever and interesting and the characters were still wonderful. The short story is a great one, very cleverly written with interesting characters and a final solution that would shock and surprise you. The Marple series has its ups and downs, whereas there have been some clunkers such as At Bertram's Hotel, there have also been some nice surprises such as this, The Blue Geranium.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |