![]() Task : sum array using parallel mode and sequential. Yesterday I tried to measure execution time and got some unclear results. Lightbend also offers an akka streams course (academy is free at this time) that delves into this topic, if you or your organization are interested in a more formal training option.I'm playing with parallel execution in Java, now. > 1ms) then you will begin to see the benefits of parallelization because the operation cost will outweigh the overhead.Ĭolin Breck has a good blog post which describes the pros and cons of parallelism in akka streams. If your operation took a non-trivial amount of time (i.e. Understand which you’re faced with and choose the right tool for the job. The parallel runtime of a program depends on the input size, the number of processors, and the communication parameters of the machine. The asymptotic runtime of a sequential program is identical on any serial platform. Some approaches are applicable to concurrency, some to parallelism, and some to both. A sequential algorithm is evaluated by its runtime (in general, asymptotic runtime as a function of input size). In order to propagate I/O between the two actors we incur extra overhead and that’s what’s skewing the results of your benchmark. Parallelism, by contrast, is an aspect of the solution domainyou want to make your program run faster by processing different portions of the problem in parallel. Concretely, everything before the async runs in one actor, and everything after runs in another. When an async boundary is introduced we create an “island” for that operation and everything before it. Output from one operator is fed directly as input to the next. By default akka streams operations are “fused” together and run by a single actor. ![]() How you benchmark your program will depend on your own success criteria. The result is that the program is faster for this input. When you use the async operator in Akka Streams it incurs extra overhead when the stream is run. Parallel: Lowest: 18889 Highest: 4.29496e+09 Time: 20.230400ms. Having multiple threads work one at a time will not go faster than if a single thread had gone through all iterations. This means that this part of the code will never be entered by more than on thread at a time. Hi example app highlights the trouble in benchmarking parallelism with trivial (fast) operations. In the following piece of your code, the whole content of the parallel for loop is wrapped into a critical statement. Here is my code: object Main extends App "))ĭo you have an idea why the sequential code is so much faster than the parallel? Is the workload not enough or did I write the parallel code in a wrong way? This means that the faster code performs the data retrieval task approximately 90 faster than the slower code. Many applications today require more computing power than a traditional sequential computer can offer. Programming on a multiprocessor system using the divide-and-conquer technique is called parallel programming. My results are always that my sequential code is a lot faster, it needs mostly around 16 sec for the computation, whereas my parallel code needs somewhere between 70 and 100 sec. Sometimes sequential processing is faster than parallel where the latter requires gathering all the data in one place. I added a warm-up phase, so the comparison is fair. ![]() And then at run-time the code may pay a penalty in start-up performance of instantiating the OpenMP run time. The compiler may not be able to as aggressively optimise the parallel code as the serial code. I used a huge amount of numbers and some mathematical operations to give the computer enough workload. Its entirely usual for the serial execution of an OpenMP program on one thread to be slower than the equivalent serial program. I used a Balancer and a Merger and my computer has 4 cores. But the sequential processing is faster than the parallel processing and I wonder why? For that purpose, I built a simple stream in a parallel and a sequential way to see the difference. I am currently trying to understand better how parallelism works in Akka Streams.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |